#16 So what's in a wiki?

Just as the main benefit of wikis is that any and all users are able to include their ideas and input into the content of information provided, it is probably also its biggest downfall. How reliable is that information if everyone has the ability to add, edit or delete it? The example of how "Library Success: a Best Practices Wiki" addresses this problem is that e-mail confirmation is required before a person's account is created.

In checking out the SJCPL Subject Guides, I had a look at photography. You were not only given information on titles the library held, which then linked you to the catalogue, you were also given information on what magazine titles were held, what local exhibitions and events were on and also what photography classes were available. So much information in one spot. There was even a list of photography blogs that one could browse.
I liked the example of the conference wiki where lots of other community information was made available. Places of interest, places to eat, what weather to expect etc. is certainly useful knowledge for people not familiar with the "conference city." Libraries could have such a community page where everyone had input in telling what their town had to offer.
Wikis would also be very useful for any teams/committees within the Library. Everyone would be assured of having the most up-to-date info and the sending of endless emails would no longer be necessary.